Originally Posted by
Dash8widget
I understand where you are coming from, your arguments just don't match what has happened in reality. That last big hiring cycle is a good example. After 9/11 the airlines were hit hard; lots of furloughs at the majors, big cuts in pay, etc. As a result, fewer people started perusing airline careers and enrollment in flight schools took a hit. Then things started to turn around. The airlines started hiring again and the regionals were growing and loosing pilots at the same time. So, the regionals had to start hiring in large numbers. But they found that the supply of well qualified pilots was much less than in years past. So what happened? The regionals began lowering their hiring requiments significantly.
Notice that they did not start parking rj's for lack of pilots - they just lowered the bar.
RJ's (at the regional level) are not the result of there being too many pilots out there - they are the result of agreements made by short sighted major airline pilot unions giving up scope for better pay. Job security and better pay will come from scope protection, NOT from cutting the number of commercial pilots coming from part 61 programs!
My point exactly! If the bar was set by the agency that governs licenses that those seats must be filled by an ATP rated pilot then you would not see the explosion of RJs. The pool of ATP rated pilots is too small and are worth more than the low wages offered by the RJ companies. Would those seats been kept at mainline? Who knows, it all depends on how the accountants costed it. To fill those jobs the wage would have to go up to attract qualified applicants.