View Single Post
Old 05-14-2009 | 09:40 AM
  #14  
voodiloquist's Avatar
voodiloquist
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: 756
Default Experience with both

Chris --

Before you go any further I would get the eyesight situation doped out.

My plan was to go with the first service that was willing to take me and I started the process as a college sophomore - I wanted fighters. I had appointments with the Navy, Marine and USAF recruiters. The Marines wanted a signed commitment following a successful flight physical. The Navy was a bit more liberal regarding a commitment in that you could pull the plug the following year (before graduation) if you changed your mind. The USAF guy did not show up.

I went with the Navy. Entered OCS two weeks after college and had a blast for 14 years. Got out, hired by an airline, and joined the Air Guard.

I agree with many of the previous observations: the USN pushes decision making down to a much lower level. Also, you will have ground jobs right from the start -- these jobs are your primary responsibility, your ability to tactically employ the aircraft within the limits of your experience and existing level of qualifications, is a given.

All services put out a top notch product.

If you want to fly a fast mover then I would recommend the USN purely based upon odds -- perform well in primary, get the jet track and whats available? Hornets and F35's (on the way) -- that's all. And, the situation is stable.

If you're looking to fly a heavy then join the USAF -- they have lots of them. Odds of getting a USAF fighter, given equal levels of flight school performance, are much lower. F16's are drawing down. All CONUS F-15 units are closing next year. Future F-22 buys are in question. In short, an unstable situation regarding fast movers not to mention the significant UAV threat.

Just my rambling thoughts. Good luck! Exciting times.

Voodiloquist
Reply