View Single Post
Old 09-15-2006 | 05:12 PM
  #12  
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
RedeyeAV8r
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak
I wasn't on the AC when EWR happened, but I understand that the LSAS (MD-11 speak for stability augmentation ) was "tweaked" to improve handling in the flare. Of the two types we fly (incl MD-10) must would agree the MD-10 is the hardest to land smoothly (the -10 of the fleet being harder than the -30). MD-10-10 is by far the biggest slug in the fleet, I think a C-150 with a pair of Sumo wrestlers would out climb the -10 from surface to 1000 ft.
To answer the original question, I think its lands quite nicely
That is a matter of opinion.......................and depends on what you flew first........the MD-11 or DC-10.. I won't argue that these beasts land differently.....You must activily flare and hold the flare in an MD-10.

But Both can be landed smoothly pretty consistently...............

It is when folks fly one model for a month or so then swap to the other model.

As Far as Hand flying goes, the MD-10-10 (Formerly Dc-10-10) is sweet.
She is old and underpowered as compared to the -30 and MD-11, but a dream to hand fly.

The MD-11 is has = to 1 engine of thrust over the MD-10-10.
Reply