Originally Posted by
meyers9163
How can we not blame the pilot group? Here at PSA we had the option to take on CRJ900s back in the day for a ZERO pay raise. Along with other reasons we said HELL no. How can you sit back and say RAH does not have the same opportunity to say, "HELL NO" to this?
And sorry but SCAB comes pretty close here. Maybe you arent crossing a picket LINE, however Midwest guys who fly a plane with one fewer seats then you will be are out of a job. They had better pay rates, better work rules, better schedules etc. By them saying NO to flying these E175s that were all but forced down their throat put them out of a job. On the same note, you are all now saying YES to flying these two new planes (with options for more) for a lesser pay rate. Other then you arent ONE pilot group, you are basically crossing the LINE. Sorry SCABS! Just like Gojets.
I know who you are and if I recall buddy, RAH was where you wanted to Go! You didn't get hired by RAH and It seems you're a bit Bitter! SCAB come on Paul! Fact is Every Regional has AT SOME POINT taken some's better paying jobs! All U guys can sit on your high horse and pretend that You regional airline don't take more responsibly than My airline or the next person's regional airline! You guys are so one tracked minded and would jump on any bandwagon! Noone over here is happy about this, we don't even have 100seat pay rates in the Contract. So before these planes Ever get flown there's some work to do!