Old 06-03-2009, 09:18 AM
  #47  
JetJock16
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Originally Posted by Reds View Post
Mesa is a publicly traded company, not to be a debbie-downer, but here are a few more facts for everyone from the 3/31/09 Q. Best wishes to Mesa pilots.

EDGAR Pro
Notes to the Financial Statements, section 3. Going Concern:
"Delta and the Company have fully briefed the issue on appeal and oral arguments in the 11 th Circuit Court of Appeals were held on January 30, 2009.
If the District Court or Court of Appeals ultimately rules in favor of Delta and allows the termination of the Connection Agreement, management believes they will be unable to redeploy the ERJ-145s in a timely manner, or at the lease rates the Company receives under the Delta Connection Agreement in the event of any re-deployment of such aircraft. As a result, if the Company is not successful in its litigation with Delta, the Company's cash flows from operations and available working capital will be insufficient to meet these cash requirements. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from an unfavorable outcome in this matter.
We currently have excess aircraft that are not operating under our code-share agreements and at go! . As of April 1, 2009, we have 37 excess aircraft consisting of five CRJ-200s (previously operated at Kunpeng Airlines), 12 ERJ-145s (previously operated under the Delta agreement) and 20 B1900Ds (previously operated at Air Midwest). We continue to pursue opportunities to sublease our excess regional jet aircraft and sell our B1900D aircraft. Our excess aircraft will have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we currently operate 26 CRJ-200s, 20 CRJ-700s and 10 Dash-8 aircraft for United pursuant to a code-share agreement. Under our agreement with United, we may swap 10 CRJ-200s for 10 CRJ-700s; to exercise this right, we must advise United of the delivery dates for the swap of 10 CRJ-700s by October 31, 2009. Also, under our United agreement, 26 CRJ-200s and 10 Dash-8s can be terminated early by United in April 2010, upon six months prior notice. We have not received notice from United regarding its intentions with respect to its CRJ-200 and Dash-8 fleet. The 26 CRJ-200 and 10 Dash-8 aircraft represent approximately 19% of the Company's revenues. Although we have early return rights for 8 CRJ-200 aircraft flying for United, we have substantial aircraft lease obligations beyond April 2010 on the remaining fleet. If United ecercises its early termination option for the CRJ-200 and/or Dash-8 aircraft, we would be unlikely to place these aircraft in revenue-generating service in a timely manner or sublease these aircraft at the lease reimbursement rates in the United code-share agreement. In the absence of obtaining additional capital through equity or debt financings, asset sales, consensual restructuring the aircraft lease terms and/or similar measures, continuing our agreement with United, or placing the aircraft with another carrier, our cash flows from operations and available working capital will be insufficient to meet our obligations."
I was more or less talking about the fact that Mesa's US contract is up in 2011. Parker has made it known that he has no intentions of working with Ornstein after their contract expires. I'm also sure that Parker's foaming at the mouth for Mesa to file BK (if DAL’s wins) so that US can "restructure" their contract.

Looking at the near future Mesa's in more than hot water. If any of these three issues unfold; DAL wins the injunction, UAL chooses to take the early termination or US does not re-up with Mesa in 2011 then Mesa's TU.

I truly wish the best for every Mesa pilot.

Last edited by JetJock16; 06-03-2009 at 09:42 AM.
JetJock16 is offline