Originally Posted by
ryan1234
One really big waste of money (to me at least) is those who train in glass... of course that's been covered in other threads.... and (to rock the boat a bit) why would anyone consider DA42 time the least bit more valuable than a complex single?
but..... chacun à son goût
First off I agree to a point. But I'll bite on your question. The DA-42 is the most complex light twin around. 6 levers vs. two? I don't get that argument
Now let me say that my argument only applies if the CFI actually makes the student know the airplane inside and out.
1. G1000, yes the scan is easy. Knowing the system, the failures, and most of all how to get the data you desire is not that easy to learn. On top of that it is flat out safer than steam.(and I'm one of those people who has watched a steam AI roll over in IMC. I like safe things
)
2. It actually has a critical engine.
3. It has huge wings and really forces a "stick and rudder" skill on the pilot.
4. FIKI, Again its easy to use the on/off switch. It's knowing the system.
5. FADEC. see above. What do I do when the ECU fails?
6. Electrical. Complex as heck for a GA light twin.
etc.
Okay now here comes the real reason I like them... I was climbing at 10k yesterday +4C
And the real reason the schools like them is because burning 8GPH in cruise helps control operating costs.
(Everthing is void if that new engine isn't certified in a year)