Originally Posted by
satchip
Look back at my posts and I predicted something like this. I thought it would be the guys who were still flying and about to turn 65. If this is not rejected on some procedural point, they have a good case. They will argue the age limit is arbitrary and capricious. Unless the FAA has some medical research that prove otherwise look for 65 to be overturned also. Sux to be us.
I agree. If there was legitimate grounds to change the law in the first place, then excluding those folks from returning might well run afoul of constitutional issues. Of course this sort of constitutional fairness only considers what's good for the plaintiff...it is blind to the affect on anyone else.
And if you're looking for a verdict that protects your rights and feelings at the expense of everyone else, the ninth circuit is the place to go! I would have been astounded if they had gone anywhere else :rolleyes: