Nope, didn't say that. Can you show me where I did?

I'll repeat it;

Doesn't mean that 70 seat operators would be exempt from a cost cutting measure.

More than likely, 50 seat feed is going to be cut. 70 seat feed may be also, may be expanded. But to clarify the above, if it comes down to a BK AGAIN, doesn't mean that UAL won't play the existing carriers against each other, AGAIN. If 70 seat carrier A is able to reduce cost below 70 seat carrier B, who's going to get the flying? Who's going to lose flying?

Make sense?