Originally Posted by
NuGuy
Heyas,
I said IF that is their position. If not, then the rest doesn't apply.
If that IS their position, then it doesn't matter which of those descriptions, if any, is correct, as we're screwed no matter what.
From some stories and reports, LM is said to have stated to the effect that the cost discount at CPZ is good for us, and that RJs are good for the airline. IF TRUE, those are not the words of a "Scope Hawk", but someone who is willing to trade bucks for any number of Buck Rogers.
Nu
OK, fine. I think they
definitely could do a better job articulating their position. That would remove the conditional part of the statement.
To scope fairy has not been kind to either the DAL or NW pilots, over the last few contracts. Said fairy has failed consistently to sprinkle any "Scope Hawk" dust on us. The testicle fairy was also absent...