View Single Post
Old 07-09-2009 | 08:43 AM
  #129  
1900luxuryliner
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Beech 1900D
Default

Originally Posted by Lab Rat
I think the best way to approach this subject is to take an objective look at the history of labor unions in the economy and the effects they have had on business. I also think one would have to look at this strictly from a business perspective as I believe the original question had to do with their perceived negative impact on business.

Of course, this may be impossible to answer as an objective analysis may lead to a subjective conclusion. i.e., too many "what ifs" in the equation. This may be why some economists are for them and why some are not.

I think it is safe to say that they have both positive and negative attributes associated with them. While some industries are able to survive quite well with them, one could probably argue that other industries were essentially all but eliminated because of them. I think the merits of the discussion are too broad to arrive at a definitive yea or nay.

I will also add that business ethics (or lack thereof) have necessitated organized labor. The intent of greed in many cases is to fatten the bottom line, but a by-product of that greed is to force a labor force to organize into a union.
Exactly! So, we are brought to the point where the possibility of objectivity is questionable, because the argument can be viewed from different angles; from the angle of looking at the direct impact unions have on business profits. Or, from the angle of viewing the broader economic impact of unionization, which indirectly impacts business profits on a more system-wide level. This is why we are in the realm of opinion and belief; not in the realm of anyone being able to say "his wife is right". Or, "his wife is wrong". Just my opinion and belief....

Last edited by 1900luxuryliner; 07-09-2009 at 09:04 AM.
Reply