Old 07-29-2009 | 02:06 PM
  #165  
Whacker77
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Default

Originally Posted by travelingWX-man
Sometimes I wonder if we really aren't our own worst enemy!?! Honestly what the h*** is wrong with some of you people. And I DO mean YOU PEOPLE! I understand that there is never going to be a magic fix for most of the problems we face. And trust me, I understand the problems with a divided pilot group, shameless management, cheap/obnoxous pax, poor work rule (my company recently decided that an 18hr day is ok, so long as the last leg is "part 91") and experience versus training, quality v. quantity bull... but is sounds like some of you have been castrated and groomed by Lorenzo himself. We finally have the public paying attention and concerned about the safety and of regionals and we call them ignorant and naive. The NTSB and Congress want to finally force the FAA to address fatigue and some of you actually have the nerve to say a shorter duty day limit might adversely affect your QOL???? (run-on alert)And after years of complaining about the 200hr wunder kid not being able to fly out of a paper bag, but willing to fly a shiny CRJ-10,000 or E-whatever for 16k a year, we finally have an important but admittedly small step of reducing their ranks and, gasp, requiring airline transport pilots to have an airline transport pilot's license and you guys balk at the idea???? Are you such a gift to aviation that you couldn't benefit from an additional 500-1000hrs of doing whatever in some sort of airplane?? I rarely post here, but felt this needed to be said. Would this accidnet have happened if these rules were in place? Probably not but who knows. But honestly, how can any line pilot say that a shorter duty day, atps mins for a atp pilot, and better access to past records is a bad thing?! Time to get over your self and Grow a SET!!!
I'm going to break my self imposed ban on this thread an make one more comment. I agree with all that you wrote. Even though this new rule will probably force me to give up on my dream, I have no problem with higher total hour standards or liscence standards. What I don't like is the arbitrary nature of the 1500 hour/ATP requirment. I don't think it allows for flexibilty or takes into account how hours were obtained.

For instance, I have 1200 TT and 200 multi. The majority of my time has come in solo flight under IFR clearances and in IFR conditions. About 50 hours of my 200 multi has come in a Citation. Only 200 hours has come as a CFI. I can spend another 300 hours teaching student pilots, but I'm not sure how much more experience I would gain. I can tell you this though. My experience level drastically improved from 500 hours to 1200 hours.
Reply