Originally Posted by
rickair7777
Automation reliable enough to allow single-pilot airliners will not happen in our working lifetimes, and probably not in our lifetimes period.
The technical challenges to achieving the needed reliability are tremendous, and center mostly around artificial intelligence capable of recognizing and responding to unforeseen events, or multiple system failures.
The problem with going single pilot is that the FAA's fundamental guiding principle on aviation safety is to accept no reduction in safety, period. Any regulatory changes must provide an equivalent or greater level of safety. Since pilots do become incapacitated occasionally, the automation must be at least as reliable (and flexible) as a human being. The flexibility is actually the hard part to achieve.
The DoD is confronting a huge reliablity issue with it's UAS's. It's OK to have low survivability with hand-launched model-airplane UAV's...they are cheap. But they have lost almost half of their predators, mostly to non-combat causes. Predators are real airplanes...they cost millions!
Also the DoD is aggressively pursuing UAS technology for combat and surveillance purposes...but not for any role involving transporting human beings.
Hey sir I beg to differ...
Ray Kurzweil - Singularity Summit at Stanford
Not to hijack the thread...
But back to the main point, I agree that there should be a total time of 1500 but I just think the whole way the airline profession is set up is the problem starting with seniority. Although I agree that time with the company should reflect QOL, schedule and pay...I disagree with upgrading somebody to captain (assuming they have the minimums) just because they have been there long enough. The ATP should be required but there needs to be an additional standardized test that would weed out those incompetent enough to be a captain.