So here's a question I've been pondering for a few days. Should the new proposed rule requiring an ATP and 1500 hours include a retroactive requirement? More specifically, should airlines be required to train First Officers already employed and issue them ATPs? Perhaps they would only be required to do so once the First Officer reaches ATP minimums - if they are not there at the time of rule issuance.

I see one huge advantage for pilots: a free ATP if you're already employed at an airline.

And I see one disadvantage: another training event at which your certificate is on the line.

Thoughts? Suggestions? Preferences?

I'd rather keep this forum focused on the retroactive question instead of the validity of the ATP and 1500 hr requirement, since that's already a pretty extensive thread. Thanks.