There of course is always 2 sides to any story, but it "appears" that this may not have been researched as well as it should have been... It also "seems" that none of the "North" reps gave input, although DALPA denies this, they can't seem to name any North guys involved. What also lends support to those that are upset is the fact they put out the APA and then revised it.
Seems par for the course for this administration though, as we went through several negotiations last year with little or no input from the little people.