Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt

Unlike BLott4 I don't think it's double-speak. I think the problem is the way it's usually taught.


It's taught as though filing the alternate is the exception. IOW, "you only have to file an alternate when..."

I think the rule is more understandable if it's taught the way the rule puts it:
==============================
... each person filing an IFR flight plan must include in it the following information:
...Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an alternate airport.
==============================
IOW, "you always have to file an alternate unless certain conditions apply."

Those conditions are pretty clearly stated: an instrument approach procedure for the destination and the "1-2-3" weather rule.