View Single Post
Old 09-13-2009 | 02:28 PM
  #22  
forumname's Avatar
forumname
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: I am the Stig
Default

To tell you the truth, I'd have to go back a reread it. You're probably correct, I thought I remember it being in there though.

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
But didn't the ATSB determine that fatigue was not a factor in this mishap?
I wouldn't doubt it. But how many times have we seen an investigating agency discount it, but we all knew better?

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I remember it being mentioned that the pilot had not had much sleep the night before - though he had a 24 hour rest before that.
True, and maybe it's happened to you, don't know. But just because somebody has had a 24 hour rest period doesn't ensure they are well rested to fly. Especially if there were multiple body clock swaps in a relatively short amount of time. As well as the sleep pattern never being able to be synced to comply with the duty period. I know it's happened to me, one just recently.

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
The other two pilots had no fatigue factors. I would think that this was a failure of procedures; not necessarily fatigue.
Edited, made a typing mistake;

Again, I'd have to go back and reread the report. But to repeat what I said, we've all heard of cases where fatigue wasn't listed as factor by the investigative body.

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Who can **really** say in the end I guess.

USMCFLYR
True, glad that a failure to verify/cross check number didn't have a fatal result.
Reply