View Single Post
Old 09-21-2009 | 12:33 PM
  #117  
BSOuthisplace's Avatar
BSOuthisplace
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
Requiring an ATP to fly 121 pax is a great move, be from the right or left seat. You will applaud the FAA for mandating this once you make the move to PIC. You need to remember that you are a crew and as the FO you have 49% voting rights and responsibility. There needs to be a minimum level of experience and expertise established so that the majority of your learning does not come while carrying revenue passengers and a PIC having to keep an eye on you. I have seen a lot of regional airlines emergency practices change over the years to compensate for low time pilots. One airline in particular makes the PIC pretty much do everything in an emergency. When something is going wrong I need a strong experienced pilot helping to ensure checklists and procedures are done correct as well as one that can fly the aircraft and make decisions unabated.
Ok, but can we all agree that there needs to be a re-emphasis on training? I know it's happening right now with the faa, but I think it's more important than this 1500 hour/ atp crap. If we are gonna be reactionary, let's be reactionary about the right things. Both a 300 hour pilot and a 10,000 hour pilot, correctly trained, will not fight a stick pusher.
Reply