Originally Posted by
FighterHayabusa
So wait, I'm confused, which part is bad, the umpteen other places both parties in congress have recklessly overspent money we didn't have? Or the carefully planned social program that was designed to run autonomously (and amazingly is projected to continue for 60 years) without intervention?
Do us all a big favor and start another thread on this if you want more input.
It doesn't belong in this thread and you will get better response with(another) seperate thread. Thanks.
Perhaps you could phrase the question to ask if people would prefer to handle their own income or prefer a government agency to do it for them. Amazing performance and projections indeed.
If 2.5 trillion in the hole constitutes a carefully planned and well run program for you, I am certain I won't be able to offer much help.