Maybe you should read a little further...
The term “circumstances over
which the Company has no control” will not include the price of fuel or other
supplies, the price of aircraft, the state of the economy, the financial state of the
Company, or the relative profitability or unprofitability of the Company’s then
current operations.
What other reason than those would the company furlough? They could try and say they are doing more furlough for future operations but even that has alot of grey area where the contract would be given the benefit of the doubt in court as it's obvious they would just be trying to get around it somehow.
Bottom line is, if it was as easy to get a hole in the contract as YOU say it is then ASA wouldn't have furloughed 57 on the last round. They would have went further than the VERY FIRST pilot hired after the contract was signed.
Alot of you guy's complain about the no furlough clause no being with a piece of toilet paper or whatever you guy's try and cleverly come up with. But the truth is the clause has already saved ALOT of our butts. Quit acting like it is worthless becaues it's not.