Old 10-01-2009 | 05:52 AM
  #5  
Scoop
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by FlyASA
Going forward ALPA needs to be focused on protecting scope and more importantly doing something about codeshares. What's to stop the majors in Skyteam, One World, and Star Alliance from code sharing with RAH on domestic flights? I doubt Tilton, Arpey, Anderson, Parker, or Smisek (well soon at least) care if RAH operates their domestic flights as long as they get a share of the money. The majors operate the international stuff and regionals do the domestic stuff in ever bigger "RJs" (C-Series anyone?) or just flat out operating A320s (like RAH/F9 will be) or 737s. It's the perfect way for them to whipsaw their own unions and combat the LCCs.

The lack of negative response out of the CEOs of majors against RAH makes me wonder if something is up. RAH is using the money from their lucrative fee for departure contracts to compete against their "partners." Why aren't these CEOs angry, they are funding their own competition!


Why should they be? Compensation for U.S. CEO's appears to be totally unrelated to profits these days. They will make milions whether they make a profit or file chapter 11.

Scoop