Originally Posted by
AirWillie
Haaaaahaha. Well first of all I don't think anyone chooses to go some place to undermine another pilot. If that is even possible, unless they're scabbing. And second you are saying it's about choice. Well the fact that RAH has been doing and will continue to do more damage to thousands of people... why don't they quit? They're there and now they're safe???? Absurd reasoning dont you think? As far as goat jetsss, the job is there. Undermine or not, it doesn't matter because it doesn't affect TSA if I get a job there or not. TSA had a chance to secure the flying like RAH has. Gojet will continue to be there with or without me or you, that was TSA's fault, nothing anyone in 2009 can do about it. Anyone that denys that is denying reality, look at the current state of TSA. Secure the flying. There is currently a pile from from all kinds of qualified pilots. I'm sure you're a very nice person but all of your posts deal with a lot of theory, not a lot of reality.
Like Freedom did for Mesa, GoJet was created to undermine TSA because they didn't want to fly the -700 for -200 pay. You chose to go to GoJet because you are willing to fly the -700 for -200 pay. You chose to be a part of circumventing their contract and that is in the spirit of scabbing.
I'm willing to give RAH the benefit of the doubt because none of their pilots were hired during the Midwest take over and none of them were hired knowing that they would replace Midwest pilots. If RAH can't negotiate a better contract then I'll be ****ed at them, until then they still have the ability to try for Jet Blue rates on the E-190. You were hired to replace TSA pilots who refused to fly for lower wages.
You can continue to rationalize all you want but if you and the rest of GoJet actually had spines you wouldn't have gone there and wouldn't leading the charge to the bottom. All I ever hear out of your group is rationalization and excuses. You know exactly what you did (or if you don't you are an idiot). Has your airline ever done anything to better the profession? Didn't think so.