Originally Posted by
DeltaPaySoon
I sure hope so. It would go a long way in stopping deals like what RAH did from happening.
I hear you on management letting ALPA negotiate "handcuffs" however if scope is ever going to mean anything, this type of language is going to have to be included or it will forever be worthless and left up to "bought and paid for" arbitrators.
I am all for having specific carriers defined in the PWA that will perform the outsourced flying.
That would possible allow us the ability to jack the house up in terms of their pay. But doing it in the DCI mess that is currently being used is a useless act.