Originally Posted by
dojetdriver
Just curious, but what were the issues going into SFO? I used to go in there a lot last year. Doing the visual, it was common for the controller to keep you high, followed by the proverbial "keep the speed up you have a 747 in trail, DON'T overtake the Brazilia landing on the parallel, contact tower, good day" from approach.
If I remember correctly, a legacy I commuted on when I was based in LGA had issues with FOQA on the ILS 4. After analyzing the data, I guess they ended up changing the approach as a specific part of it called for excessive descent rates in a particular segment of the procedure, which was leading to unstable approaches, high touchdown speeds/floating.
All the stuff you mentioned was pretty much the problem. On the 320 we often got the Bridge Visual to the right side, & the 320 doesn't exactly slow down fast. It was important to be slowed to 170 kias by the time you turned to final otherwise things could get nasty quick.