Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
You read the blast mail that we sent out?
I've got some real problems with that "blast mail."
Were certain candidates told a deadline to get responses in and then had the deadline change to their disadvantage and exclusion? Answer: Yes.
Did certain candidates get to see the answers provided by other candidates in advance, providing them the opportunity to edit their own? Answer: Yes.
That blast mail was sent to C44 with no identification of the originator, no identification of the authors of the questions, and an inequitable opportunity for answering by all the candidates.
It was akin to one side of a debate being provided the answers beforehand.
Is this the type of "leadership" we can expect from folks who campaign in this manner?
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
The goal was to have each candidates answers side by side so you the pilots could make the best decision for yourself. We want what is best for this council, even if that means one does not get elected.
If that was the goal, then this episode sure doesn't support it. This creates the appearance of dirty politics.