Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Everyone was given the same deadline by the author. In fact there was no set deadline.
I know at least one candidate that will vociferously disagree. He was disadvantaged.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Only to send it, no amendments were made that I am aware of. (Convert to a PDF file so that the answers could not be changed)
The fact that this was e-mailed on behalf of a candidate and that candidate had the opportunity to amend creates the appearance of impropriety. If there was no improper intent, then it shows how naive some involved in this process are.
It's good that you acknowledge the questions were slanted and that this wasn't really an issue identification piece. I view it as a poorly disguised advocacy piece.