View Single Post
Old 10-29-2009 | 11:26 AM
  #80  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
KC10 FATboy
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 82
From: Legacy FO
Default

Originally Posted by winglet
Pet Peave Alert, Pet Peave Alert!

While not dismissing the occaisional use of a wind check, excessive and habitual "wind checks" are for automatons. Seaplane and "bush" pilots safely land thousands of times a day all over the world without the aid of a "wind check", a tower, atis, a windsock, a runway etc. A good pilot is constantly attuned to their environment and is aware of their crab angle as well as the crab angle of other aircraft, tree leaves, wave patterns, blowing dust, tire smoke, etc, etc...

Many "wind checks" are used as a crutch by inattentive "airplane operators" not aviators. Wind checks are only necessary if the pilot is uncertain of a dynamic wind vector that could be a factor in the safety of the landing. There are usually numerous cues that make a wind check request unecessary. An attentive pilot should have a very good idea of the wind conditions for the runway of intended landing long before short final.

Remember that the wind readout from the tower is from a location on the field that may or may not be near the approach end of the runway you are landing on. While not advocating the banishment of the "wind check" let's listen up, pay attention and use it more sparingly please.

Sorry.....can't.....stop.....typing!!!

All better now...

winglet
For the record ... if you saw my previous post about the Captain who requested a windcheck on every landing, he was ... <clearing my throat> a naval AVIATOR. Sorry, I had to play on your own words. hahaha
Reply