View Single Post
Old 11-06-2009 | 12:12 PM
  #24  
newKnow's Avatar
newKnow
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by StallFail
I completely understand your angle, but if the government can put their foot down on racial or gender discrimination, then why not age discrimination...? It really, really bothers me.

Compass seems to be taking it to an extreme-- especially before any significant legislation gets signed into law by Comrade Obama.
Don't be bothered and don't look for any legislation to be passed. Congress has already taken care of age discrimination just as this poster has indicated:


Originally Posted by Oberon
For what it's worth...

Age discrimination is only protected for employees over the age of 40. Wiki the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. Compass could set an arbitrary age of 23 or 39 and be within the bounds of the law, that's not good business though....


If you get hired quit your whining...Compass has already exceeded it's whining quota.
Here's the summary....

Written in 1967, The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, Pub. L. No. 90-202, 81 Stat. 602 (Dec. 15, 1967), codified as Chapter 14 of Title 29 of the United States Code, 29 U.S.C. § 621 through 29 U.S.C. § 634 (ADEA), prohibits employment discrimination against persons 40 years of age or older in the United States (see 29 U.S.C. § 631(a)). It also applied to standards for pensions and benefits provided by employers and requires that information about the needs of older workers be provided to the general public.
The ADEA was later amended in 1986 and again in 1991 by the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (Pub. L. 101-433) and the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (P.L. 102-166).
Reply