Originally Posted by
AirbusA320
Sounds like the Legacies are TOO BIG TO FAIL.
Anyone see in USA Today, 11/10/09 article, "Reshuffled deck leaves low-cost carriers king"? The man jist is traditionals are losing ground to low-cost airlines.
First of all.. what is a "low cost" carrier? DAL is THE low COST carrier across the Atlantic. Is SWA still considered a "low cost" carrier? Their costs are as high if not higher in some respects than DAL's. Their fares certainly are.. So what does this bullplop term really mean?