Originally Posted by
Tuck
Does anyone notice the recent X-pairings that seem to violate the RFO rule for blocks > 7:35? I've written to the X-pairing new email at ALPA but no response so maybe I'm incorrect? I thought it was a hard parameter in the CBA?
Check out 2272/2DEC MEM 11 and 2136/13NOV MEM 11 as 2 examples.
I am interestd in whatever you found out and I agree, it looks like a RFO would be in the best interest of safety due to duty times and foreign theater flying.