Originally Posted by Tuck

Does anyone notice the recent X-pairings that seem to violate the RFO rule for blocks > 7:35? I've written to the X-pairing new email at ALPA but no response so maybe I'm incorrect? I thought it was a hard parameter in the CBA?

Check out 2272/2DEC MEM 11 and 2136/13NOV MEM 11 as 2 examples.