Originally Posted by
USMCFLYR
agree completely.
My only problem with the traditional CFI route (in my own opinion) wass that I didn't think that I knew enough to instruct.
Now before CFI's across the nation start jumping on me here - let me make it plain that I am giving my views at the time. I did not want to move right to CFI'ing. Unfortunately it became apparent that it was much harder to build any sort of meaningful time otherwise. I did end up flying jumpers for a little while.
My personal opinion did not change after I joined the military. I was not a great believer in the FAIP/SERGRAD program of the AF/USN. I had the same opinion - that instructors needed some 'fleet' experience before instructing fledgling aviators.
Since them I have seen those programs produce some great pilots and instructors - though again in my own opinion it wouldn't have been for me.
Some of the greatest moments of my career have been as an instructor, but I was very greateful for the growing experience of the 'fleet' before attmepting to pass on anything to the 'young'uns'.
USMCFLYR
It is an unusual situation, having mostly to do with economics.
Brand-new instructors have just spent 200-300 hours pounding out the maneuvers...they can generally help others to do the same, and that is what checkrides emphasize.
While the wisdom imparted by an experienced greybeard would certainly be good stuff, most students shop with price as a significant factor or the main factor. Schools can employ low-time CFI's (who can't go anywhere else) for low-time wages and sell a low-cost package that sets the bar for industry. The good news is that there is usually someone with experience on staff, and students generally get exposed to that person also, at least in ground training.
I do know a few professional free-lance CFI's who can charge $80/hour...and there are some clients who will pay for the experience. Many rich guys are cheap to a fault, but some of them have learned about false economy and best value concepts...