I never did say what most scientists believe, and I actually would like more scientists to look for and report evidence that counters global warming. What I don’t like is when people try to prove their point by stating today’s weather. The only thing it does is oversimplify a complex process causing uninformed readers to quickly jump to one side of the debate before they know any relevant facts. Stating the today’s weather is just as annoying as saying the ice caps are smaller this year than last.

So there is a blizzard in the Midwest, up in northern Maine, it was 53 degrees when last year it was only 26 degrees. There are two weather events that lead to two different conclusions on global warming. Also, no one can agree on what weather patterns will do when the average temperature rises, so maybe another blizzard in the Midwest is a result of global warming. For me, that is the biggest argument against global warming because if scientists are going to claim that the climate is going to change drastically, they should know what that change will be.

And also, Al Gore is not a scientists, so who cares what he says or thinks. He is just a supporter of global warming who has enough money and fame to get media attention. Al Gore is responsible for spreading the fear of global warming that has created uneducated activists, I will give you that, but attacking Al Gore won’t solve this debate anymore than attacking Glenn Beck or any other conservative who thinks global warming is fake.