Originally Posted by
Ski Patrol
For starters there is the first gaping hole in the equation. Somebody probably already mentioned it but the graphs compare turboprop payscales to jet. Apples and Oranges that's all.
Correct, it's a worst case scenario comparison. Also technically turboprop to jet is meaningless. Q400 vs ERJ135 for example... the Q should obviously pay more. I'm assuming you were implying turboprops should pay less. The next graph im trying to work on involves hourly vs seating capacity.