Originally Posted by
BTPM
I know that there are many out there that do not approve of people paying for time, but I would like to offer this up for your consideration. Many of you did pay to build time in a twin (Seminole/Duchess), there are many pilots out there that do not have an MEI and have built their required multi time by renting. So what is the difference between paying to gain experience in a twin turbine or paying to fly a Seminole around? I used to disapprove of "first officer" programs, until I flew with one. She was very professional, and demonstrated excellent airmanship, when she had completed her time, we hired her into a Brasilia. I believe that she is now a Captain at Republic. This young woman knew that she did not want to instruct, and she felt that she could better herself professionally through a 'first officer' program, and she was correct. She personally changed my opinion about these programs. I think in the right environment these programs can be excellent as they teach young pilots how things work in the real world. Lets face it, instructors out there are just baby pilots themselves, and have no idea how 135 or 121 operators actually do it in the real world. Just remember what you get out of an experience is what you put into an experience.
Did you really ask this question without giving it some serious thought? If you pay one company to fly their airplanes , what's to stop the others from doing the same? Would you pay every company a "fee" for the privilege of flying for them. If you were hired by UAL and then had to pay them $50,000.00 to sit in the right seat, what would you think? Get hired because you have the qualifications and the "right" stuff. Besides, if you had ten grand, you could take most of the pilots on this forum out to a swell dinner.