Originally Posted by
Sink r8
This feels a little bit like having your teenage daughter storm out of the room screaming "You hate me!".
Let's try it again.
First, let me say this: Carl, we love you all Northern Brothers like family... because you are, OK? Maybe you need a hug, and maybe we need to say together "It's not my fault, it's not my fault..." and have a good cry together.
...but we don't hate you.
OK, now... I think what the guy was saying is that the company is trying to float the message that that one side is growing, the other side not, in order to influence representation issues. They have put some stuff out on DeltaNet, both for Inflight and ACS suggesting same. Check it out for yourself. I can't access the IFS part from home, but it's on the ACS part (Departments>ACS>Memo from Gil Somebody).
The original poster wasn't endorsing the message, but pointing out the not-so-subtle hint he thought was being given. The reason he had to put up the part you find offensive is that quoting the company's message would be meaningless without it.
And maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he wasn't alluding to that ACS/IFS message, and just looking at fleets, and all he was saying is that the company is in fact shrinking one side to drive a message, I still don't think he was making any derogatory or false statements. We did park the B-747-200, and we are parking DC-9's. That's not offensive: it's only true. We also both parked 757's, as you say. OK, fine. No matter which way you look at this, you have to really want to be offended, in order to end up offended.
I think that's why there weren't any (other) debates after his post.
You keep repeating something that is patently misleading at best if not down right false. One side is NOT shrinking while the other side is growing. Both sides are growing some parts of their former fleets, and shrinking some parts of their former fleets. That's not arguable.
It sure is hard to find out your salient point in a post that long dude.
Carl