Originally Posted by
Wasatch Phantom
Carl,
To piggyback on Denny's comments, I would agree that DAL-S pilots were pretty fired up for Contract 2000. However, Contract 2000 followed a very concessionary contract referred to as POS 96. That contract was approved by the DAL-S pilots by a substantial (and surprisingly large) majority.
As Contract 2000 was being negotiated it was interesting that very few pilots would own up to the fact that they had voted for POS 96.
That lead me to the conclusion that DAL-S pilots in general talk tough in the cockpit, the crewroom and on Internet forums; but they vote in the privacy of their homes. There the thought process is: "It's not that bad a contract. I've got a mortgage payments, car payments, etc. I can't afford to go on strike..." followed by a "yes" vote.
The scary part for me is that very few are talking tough on this internet forum. Most are making management's case every time. That's why I hope that most of these apologists are not pilots at all, but cubicle inhabitants at Mecca (ATL).
Originally Posted by
Wasatch Phantom
I can't recall a single instance of DAL-S pilots rejecting something the MEC endorsed. If our MEC continues lowering expectations, it'll be a very tough fight to get a good contract.
This is why I'm so insistent on us requesting our Section 6 opener this year. It will be a clear signal to
all participants that expectations are on the rise.
Carl