Originally Posted by
AFW_MD11
That's what I thought - RAT not the same as SUB trip assignment.
The ALPA calendar flow chart is a little misleading as the first block question is "was a RAT offered in the initial assignment period?"
leads one to believe it's the same question as "was a SUB trip assigned in the initial assignment period?" - that question doesn't come til a little further down the decision tree (in the ALPA calendar)
just sayin'....don't confuse RAT with SUB - not the same!
And don't forget that a RAT trips pays 125% (assuming the RAT trip is same base pay as the trip that went away)