cornbeef007,
Thanks for the reply. I was wondering when someone would notice me and say "Hey what's he doing in this thread!".

I appreciate your post on the differences between doing the PIC thing in 121 vs 135. I've often wondered about 121, how I would fit in, or if it would be the right thing for me. Don't know the answers to those questions, but I suspect from reading what many in the Regional 121 world deal with it's not for me. Probably too set in my ways by now.

I understand the MEL allowances for flight with some inoperative equipment.

I also appreciate the fact that a company has to make money, get the flights done, track a much larger pilot group than what I've ever flown with, and do all these things safely, legally, and as on time as they can.

What I have a problem with is this specific incident involving the Pinnacle Captain. I do not understand how a company could even fathom disciplining a pilot in this manner for doing what they thought was right, and safe.

You remember all the human factors stuff that was specific to Alaska flying I'm sure. Don't fly because you are pressured by company or passengers. Don't fly when you are unsure of the outcome. Don't push the weather. Don't push other pilots to do anything they are unsure of. Wait. Get it done but get it done safe.

I guess I have a hard time wrapping my head around the way this company has treated this pilot. For following what seems to me very similar guidance I've had from old timer 135 pilots who have lost lots of friends and bent lots of aluminum.