View Single Post
Old 02-15-2010 | 06:26 AM
  #28854  
acl65pilot's Avatar
acl65pilot
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
It's one that was tremendously effective when active from 1945 through 1973. When reactivated in a post deregulation environment it looked really cool as the lead ship of a surface action group, but wound up killing more of its own sailors than the enemy. It use, expense, and lack of efficacy caused tremendous division inside the US Navy. Ultimately it was retired. It is still looked upon fondly by the battleship admirals and armchair warriors, but it has been supplanted in modern naval warfare by air and submarine power.

Yup, the analogy is still good!
I knew you would like it. I posted it for you to critique. I agree that the Seawolf class of Submarine. Too bad we only build half of what we were planning on.

So what ship was it? You just described a few of these boats. We spent a lot of money bringing them out of mothballs.