Originally Posted by
N2264J
I believe in peer reviewed science. Nothing so far has shaken my confidence in the rigor of the scientific method.
Nor mine, but we are not dealing with scientific method here, unless of course you think jumbled data, poor models based on poor data, hidden results and foregone conclusions constitute scientific method.
By the way, I like your cigarette example-when they were found to be dangerous the government really embraced the business as a revenue maker for the tax coffers. They make(take) far more in that business than the tobacco companies. Ironic, isn't it?