Originally Posted by
Beagle Pilot
Actually, this is true. Several years ago Eagle ALPA grieved the contracting of both TSA and CHQ as AA feeders since it violated our scope clause. The ruling was no violation took place since ALPA's scope clause was between the Eagle pilots and American Eagle Airlines whereas the TSA and CHQ contracts were between them and AA.
hate to disagree because I likely will not get the last word - but arb ruled that this was EXISTING flying and therefore not a violation of scope. He did say ANY new flying belonged to ae. therefore, a new grievance was filed as it does fit this category of new flying.