Originally Posted by
keenster
I think that most of us do not like to see Rj's flying a city pair that used to be mainline. There is nothing wrong with that. To think in terms of furlough fodder is second grade dude. What do you want outsource everything????????
IMHO, based on how our airlines desires to fly, there is no way they would even entertain a city pairs clause in section one. I would like to see the number of 76 seat jets allowed capped at 153. They state that they do not want any more, so lets make them commit to that.