View Single Post
Old 02-26-2010 | 04:04 AM
  #29541  
scambo1's Avatar
scambo1
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
As much as I'd like to have DCI airplanes at mainline Delta, I can't see it happening - here's why:

Cost.

While some of the pilot group would like to have the EMB-175s, CRJ-900, CRJ-700, the 50 seater, etc at mainline, the pay rates we would have to accept are far too low. I'm not just talking about the rates that other airlines are currently flying them at.

I'm talking, really low rates to pay for all the other costs that Delta would have to absorb. The DCI airplanes right now are maintained by mechanics being are probably paid less than they are at Delta. The planes are dispatched using dispatchers who are paid less than Delta dispatchers. Cleaned by people making less than Delta cleaners (maybe, they might use the same people). The Flight attendants make less than Delta flight attendants. The gate agents are paid less than Delta gate agents.

Also, each of those employee groups are paid the same whether they are working on a CRJ50 or a CRJ-900 (say, at Pinnacle which fly both I think). Pilots get paid more for a bigger plane - other employee groups don't.

So - let us say Delta said, "let brings over the CRJ-900 to mainline". Pilots will be paid the existing rate that we're paying at Pinnacle. We'd ***** and moan, but in the end, we'd understand that it's the competitive rate. Now other employee groups don't get paid more or less for different sized airplanes. The cost of repairing the CRJ-900 would be at mainline Delta costs - not DCI costs. Same for dispatchers, cleaners, and flight attendants.

So - the cost of dispatching, maintaining, serving drinks, etc on the former DCI plane go up, but the pilot cost would be the same. Well - unless the pilot group can convince the other labor groups to be paid less for flying the CRJ-900, the pilots are going to have to take the cost hit for the airplane to remain profitable.

Who else would take the hit? Management isn't going to operate the plane at a loss just to have more pilots on the payroll. Honestly, people aren't going to pay more to fly a CRJ-900 because it's operated by Delta employees vs DCI employees so we can't raise revenue. Most pax don't even know how the whole code-share system works anyway. The other labor groups aren't going to switch to being paid less to work on a CRJ-900 because it's not in the way their pay system is designed.

So - we might have to work for much less than what current DCI pilots are paid if we want the airplanes at mainline, in order for these sized airplanes to be profitable.

This is what I feel ALPA is saying when they say, "you don't want to work for the pay rates that will bring the plane to mainline."
-------------
IA;

I disagree for (at least) three reasons:

1. Fee for departure / guaranteed profit. It would be cheaper to fly them at mainline.

2. Economies of scale - dispatch, mx, gate agents, res, etc. The bigger an enterprise, the (relativelely) less expensive the cost per sample size (widget).

3. We are already doing much of the service work for them.

Bring 'em to mainline, the cost is not that great. It is the new entry level, but at least we are all rowing in the same direction.
-------
Two reasons Comair is getting spanked so hard lately:

1. They were bad and there is no "military school" for DCIs.

2. (subset) Delta doesnt have full control of all of the other DCI's. Comair is the "flex" in the whole DCI system.