Originally Posted by
wags3539
Noted...like I said, I'm not necessarily saying that raising minimums to 1500 hours is a bad thing, I'm just saying I can see it from the view of a student pilot as well. Just having 1500 hours does not guarantee that you will be exposed to the examples you have posted above. If I were to have 1500 hours tooling around in a Cessna 150 as a flight instructor, I wouldn't necessarily be exposed to 16 hour days, reduced rest, dealing with MX control/dispatch, etc. I'm not saying that flight instructing is not valuable, I agree that a 1500 hour pilot will most likely have better decision making abilities since they are exposed to more. I say most likely because you can fly for 1500 hours and not run into a single problem, while at the same time somebody else could fly for 100 hours and have an engine failure/fire right after takeoff. It's all relative, which is why I think quality of flight time and experience should still be taken into consideration.
I agree, I understand why students would oppose this. But don't let them sway YOUR opinion...they simply don't know what they don't know yet.
The are blinded by the horrible prospect of having to work as a CFI for two years...but after they are done they will be glad they did. And 10-15 years down the line they will be REALLY glad that they can't be easily undercut out of their job by a pimple-faced 19 year-old 250-hour wonder.