Originally Posted by
luvflyer69
Actually the way FAPA was during thes short time negotiating with SWAPA, SWAPA owes nothing to FAPA. I think it is kind of Ironic that what FAPA was demanding of SWAPA might come back to bite them in the A_S!
Negotiating? SWAPA offered FAPA the worst case scenario and said take it or leave it. FAPA was more than willing to negotiate for an additional week and if that didn't work let it go to mediation and then arbitration. Why was SWAPA so opposed to letting an arbitrator hear our respective cases and then make his ruling? Surely SWAPA's case would have been a slam dunk right?