Originally Posted by
N2264J
Actually, peer reviewed science does agree on what's causing the deterioration of the atmosphere and the resultant climate change - just not the corporately funded hacks you're betting your future on.
And that's really your bottom line, isn't it?
I'm not like you. To me, willfully destroying the planet's environment doesn't seem like a worthwhile trade off for getting or keeping a flying job.
The longer we wait to address this, the more drastic and expensive the metric shift will be.
And who funds those peer reviewers and can they get a job if they don't come to the left conclusion?