Originally Posted by
ATCsaidDoWhat
The vetting was the responsibility of the "committee" who picked him from hundreds...the committee is headed by and hand picked by John Sluys; the same guy who improperly used Flight Pay Loss money to run Praters election campaign. Just like a couple of others did.
So if we're gonna demand anything, it should be the removal of the committee for not properly vetting the guy. By the time Jan got it; they no doubt insisted he was golden and pushed back hard if he tried to vet the guy.
Jan is a stand up person. He did not deserve to be slimed by this crowd.
No argument from me. I also know Jan and he should not be the "only target". I still think it should have been reviewed by the Staff Communications Director as well as Jan before it ever hit the streets. Let's face it, the first time I read the article, I was very skeptical as to Tim's "background" as were a lot of other people.
S'Long Mate
