Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
There is a lot to learn about it. What Bar is basically saying is that D-ALPA took a 600 million dollar bargaining credit for relaxed scope, and Slow and Alfa are telling him he is full of bs.
Point to all of it is, that Bar wants to make a salient point that we better not sell 100 seat flying.
However, you can make a salient point without twisting the facts to conform with a preconceived idea of what went on. There was much more at stake than $600M and there was much more to the story than a quid pro quo trade. There is nothing quid pro quo about an 1113c contract rejection. Alfa and Slow have first hand knowledge of what went on, I give them a great deal more credibility in this debate.
If Bar's salient point is that scope should not be traded for bargaining credits, I agree completely.