Old 04-11-2010 | 06:20 AM
  #13  
Flyby1206's Avatar
Flyby1206
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 41
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Beagle Pilot
Woo-Hoo! Agreed! While it's possible another minor L3 grievance can be filed, I think Nicolau was pretty clear about the resolution to this matter. Any questions we have will be clarified, but my understanding is all the parties thoroughly understood what the arbitration means. This isn't a contract negotiation or a mutual agreement, it's an arbitration resolution. There is no debate. There is no decision to be made about whether to accept it, ratify it or otherwise decide if it is a good enough document to agree upon. It's a decree. All parties have to accept it. That's what binding arbitration means. It's only idiots like USAPA who don't understand that concept.
I agree, but dont you think there will be some gray areas in the ruling regarding the implementation procedures?
Reply