View Single Post
Old 04-11-2010 | 08:06 AM
  #33829  
Waves's Avatar
Waves
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: SLC 767ER Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Waves,

Ill take a stab at the pay thingie. It will be overly simplistic, but I'm overly simplistic.

Keenster is a whale guy so his hours are, in general, the same from month to month (low but somewhat consistent) where yours and mine are probably a lot alike.

The two premerger airlines manned differently, which makes comparisons difficult. NWA manned by block hour vs Delta manned by jet. If I knew any more than that I've forgotten......great memory, it's just real short.

Both airlines carried a minimum number of guys to cover basically winter then got used to guys flying overtime in the summer. You did it with GS and rolling thunder (I still don't know what that is), we did it with a flex up months. It's like ALV but different.....shoot I don't even remember what it was called.

But, for example, in the winter I would normally fly 73 to 75 hours. In the summer I'd fly 85 and I can remember flying 88 after bankruptcy (scheduled not picked up, modified or BOBed). In fact, even up to Bid period 5 for us 757 guys, the Asia trips were 14 day 83-85 hour trips.

So as you can see, the arbitrators were wrong. I flew straight time for 7 or 8 hours a month and the rest would be built so most guys were flying 1.5 over 80.

Just a different way of skinning the cat. Oh, and we also had your version of the green slip. Super premium dog **** trips that were unsellable that went for 2x......never did one. In fact I refused to commute to high time, too much like tempting fate. Plus, I thought picking up high time with guys on furlough was immoral.

Dont know if that helps

Ferd
Ferd, thanks for the update. I’m still a bit confused (my normal state of mind). So what I’m hearing is that the numbers put together by the mediation attorneys were incorrect, although not ultimately disputed or challenged by the NWA’s attorneys? I truly have a difficult time swallowing that concept. What you are saying contradicts their researched studies and number crunching. A lot of time, energy, research, and experience went into figuring that stuff out. Additionally, the three highly experienced arbitrators didn’t see it the way you do either. I’m not saying their numbers are correct, but can you see why I’m having difficulty here? It is a big contradiction and just doesn’t make sense to me, but I’m still listening.

Having said that though, I am rethinking the GS versus the 1.5X method of overtime pay. It may be a better mouse trap.